xxplosive
Veteran
- Mar 31, 2016
- 944
- 4
I can say that as long as I am eating enough protein, staying consistent etc, I dont really plateau and continue to add weight or reps from one workout to the next.
Few principles I have made a staple:
1) Full Range of Motion - I give myself a bit of leeway in this regard in that since I train with maximum intensity and to failure, it's tough to keep a full range of motion on the last of a low rep set when you're aiming for strength/power. That said, the next workout or two I am able to see these same reps at full range, while I struggle onto heavier reps. I think to avoid a full range is to not activate all the fibers possible in a muscle at its largest state - the eccentric phase.
2) TRAIN TO FAILURE - I simply cant understand the argument NOT to if your goal is to make the most gains in size/strength.
I want to clear up a common misconception about the context of "Failure", as I believe many mistakenly shy away from this method for fear of injury. "Failure" does not mean you lift much heavier than you are capable of and overexert yourself for low reps- it simply means picking a weight that for YOU at that desired rep range, will be a struggle to finish the LAST set, or unable to. Unable meaning you fall short 1-3 reps.
In my experience, doing this and rebuilding correctly, I am guaranteed to do at least 1 more rep the next time I do that workout.
3) Compound Lifts = Lower (6-10) Reps/More Sets
Iso Movements = Higher Reps (8-15)/Fewer Sets
My reasoning behind this is that with compound movements, you're gonna be using some heavy weights, and its just not safe to jump right into working sets. The heavier your working sets, the more "warm up sets" you will need to do. Not only is this safer, but you will end up lifting more by your latter sets by letting your muscles acclimate to the heavier weights.
As for iso movements and smaller muscles... I'll admit I go by reading my body and doing 5 reps of any weight dumbell curl, 8 calf raises, etc just doesnt feel like it does anything. Youre generally not using incredible weight poundage so the number of reps needs to increase to reach the loads on compound lifts
4) Lift EXPLOSIVELY
Meaning contract hard and fast- its not a secret that heavier weights and short bursts recruit and stimulate Type IIa muscle fibers, nor that those types of muscle fibers have the highest propensity for growth.
I am NOT advocating poor/sloppy technique for the sake of speed/aggression, but power/strength/size go hand in hand if you're taking in enough calories, and I personally have never seen or known anyone huge and powerful using slow, overly controlled movements.
The NFL is full of DL and LB's who if they CHOSE to pump themselves full of deca,dbol, adrol, high dose test and 10iu's of gh, cut back on the high intensity conditioing and ate 500-600g of protein a day, could IMHO step on stage and compete.
I can guarantee you they are not doing slow reps (though many of them have already built a great base by the time they're in the league and focus more on balance/speed).
Few principles I have made a staple:
1) Full Range of Motion - I give myself a bit of leeway in this regard in that since I train with maximum intensity and to failure, it's tough to keep a full range of motion on the last of a low rep set when you're aiming for strength/power. That said, the next workout or two I am able to see these same reps at full range, while I struggle onto heavier reps. I think to avoid a full range is to not activate all the fibers possible in a muscle at its largest state - the eccentric phase.
2) TRAIN TO FAILURE - I simply cant understand the argument NOT to if your goal is to make the most gains in size/strength.
I want to clear up a common misconception about the context of "Failure", as I believe many mistakenly shy away from this method for fear of injury. "Failure" does not mean you lift much heavier than you are capable of and overexert yourself for low reps- it simply means picking a weight that for YOU at that desired rep range, will be a struggle to finish the LAST set, or unable to. Unable meaning you fall short 1-3 reps.
In my experience, doing this and rebuilding correctly, I am guaranteed to do at least 1 more rep the next time I do that workout.
3) Compound Lifts = Lower (6-10) Reps/More Sets
Iso Movements = Higher Reps (8-15)/Fewer Sets
My reasoning behind this is that with compound movements, you're gonna be using some heavy weights, and its just not safe to jump right into working sets. The heavier your working sets, the more "warm up sets" you will need to do. Not only is this safer, but you will end up lifting more by your latter sets by letting your muscles acclimate to the heavier weights.
As for iso movements and smaller muscles... I'll admit I go by reading my body and doing 5 reps of any weight dumbell curl, 8 calf raises, etc just doesnt feel like it does anything. Youre generally not using incredible weight poundage so the number of reps needs to increase to reach the loads on compound lifts
4) Lift EXPLOSIVELY
Meaning contract hard and fast- its not a secret that heavier weights and short bursts recruit and stimulate Type IIa muscle fibers, nor that those types of muscle fibers have the highest propensity for growth.
I am NOT advocating poor/sloppy technique for the sake of speed/aggression, but power/strength/size go hand in hand if you're taking in enough calories, and I personally have never seen or known anyone huge and powerful using slow, overly controlled movements.
The NFL is full of DL and LB's who if they CHOSE to pump themselves full of deca,dbol, adrol, high dose test and 10iu's of gh, cut back on the high intensity conditioing and ate 500-600g of protein a day, could IMHO step on stage and compete.
I can guarantee you they are not doing slow reps (though many of them have already built a great base by the time they're in the league and focus more on balance/speed).
